Aha moments: MHV's Peng on retention and viral coefficient for startups
Sep 6, 2023

Community notes by: Sina, CTO/CEO of Learning Loop
Disclaimer: This post is not written by AI. A Learning Loop member wrote them while listening to the talk. Therefore the notes aren’t direct quotes. The speaker isn’t responsible for how these notes or the tone are perceived/interpreted. If you have questions about specific parts of the post, email team@learningloop.org for clarification
Conversation between:
Came to the event primarily curious about this:
Peng has founded match.com that shaped how people date, Interwoven (CMS) before CMS was mainstream and took it public in NASDAQ, and Ecentuate (identity management) and sold to IBM. And now running a VC firm for the past 10 years that a lot of founders I know respect a lot. Sure he has had teams that have worked with him in all of this, but for a founder to found 4 great things in a row is too statistically significant to be a coincidence. He must have superior mental models. How does he look at the world?
Notes:
How do you view the world?
You have to observe ridiculous states of the world and do something about it
A state of the world that makes you go “what? That makes no sense”
Going thru printed classified ads back in the day and marking it with a pencil to call the person later vs digitising it became match.com
Thousands of people trying to produce stuff on 1 stuff and constantly taking the website down as a consequence. That’s ridiculous, you need a CMS.
When he was younger, he looked at the ridiculous things in the world in narrow areas.
Now he looks at larger scale. e.g. 1/3 of kids alive today won’t be literate when they grow up. Nobody is working on this although it’s crazy.
Where did R+K>1 come from?
reference: https://www.monkshill.com/content-hub/series-a-startups-take-note-r-k-1-is-your-formula-for-success
LTV/CAC was leading some of the portfolio companies to death, because CAC is controlled by Google/FB/tiktok etc. and it’s out of your control.
Five years ago we started thinking in terms of relate retention and engagement and how those things need to behave for business to make sense
Objectively how much do the client customers/client/employees love the business, and how many new clients/customers are they bringing
If R+K < 1 then the total number of clients/customers keep dropping until you die
What’s the minimum sample size and timeline for measuring this?
Statistically at least 100 users and at least 6 months for you to know As a VC I prefer 12 months, and of course I prefer a sample size of 5000 clients/customers than 100
Many b2b and enterprise focused companies optimise for revenue and probably not vitality/engagement/retention in the b2c sense. Does R+K>1 still apply?
He’s a b2b first guy and most businesses he’s built and invested in are enterprise and b2b
They initially thought this model doesn’t work for b2b
He still doesn’t know if it will
But he has CEOs that are thinking in terms of B2E2E2B. The E is employees
Creating and measuring vitality in terms of the number of new clients the employees in your target organisation bring onboard
e.g. Slack sold to 3 people in a company and they brought everyone else in that org onboard, and eventually other orgs
A network within the company
Another angle is community building
Audience question: how do you think about retention in the case of platforms like Carsome where user may buy a car from them every 5 years?
By creating a a new type of relationship beyond that transaction
Engaging customer via community or outbound messages that helps the business learn more about the customers and their needs and adding new value to customers that the customers may not be asking for but would appreciate/pay for
It’s like everyone having an agent
Audience question: at what point do you decide if a company is worth investing in, since building a community and network effects isn’t easy and require lots of resources.
In the end it’s about the efficiency of the business
If you have a highly profitable without network effects he will still consider to invest, but then the question is can you scale?
Can you scale just as profitably
Can you scale without a community
Your cost of sales goes up independently of you when you don’t have network effects, just because of market forces
You lose control over your business model
We don’t like business where the founders dont have control over their business
Advice for early stage companies with little resources?
There’s a whole spectrum
If you’re b2b, your LTV/CAC is probably high enough, and you can take your time to build a community. And also you need to engage your employees a lot before you can build a community.
But if you’re building something that needs a community in order to improve your unit economics, you need to build it upfront. you can’t build a business first and then figure out the R+K>1, the community becomes a prerequisite.
R+K>1 kicks in right after pmf, when you need to “grow” the business. You must derisk PMF first.
R is a great product. K is also a great product.
If you build a great product, people use it, stay, and bring other people to it.
Build something that’s as retentive as possible and as viral as possible.
You may have a product that can be viral and retentive but you haven’t built in structures that leverage it. e.g. lock in factor, how many steps does it take to invite someone? 20 clicks? Vs 2
How do you balance paid growth vs vitality?
There is a whole spectrum from free new members vs full CAC members
When you have 0 users, you can invite all your friends. A very slow way to crank up a system. You pay money to get people on the system to see if your R and K are any good.
It’s a learning process to use R and K to jumpstart your engine and see what’s equation producing. If you get users and R+K<1 then there’s no point getting more members.
If there’s a leaky bucket, dont pour more resources into it.
Use your resources to optimise your R+K>1 to get the product model right
You wanna get to R+K>1 while your LTV/CAC is at least 2 (LTV/CAC may drop to less than 2 at some points in your business’s lifetime and if R+K<1 or = then you don’t have a business anymore)
There are semi paid for things like “buy 2 for 1” and etc. that are okay. You can use them but it’s best if it’s viral by design (free new members vs full CAC members)
The best ones are people telling other people because it’s good
Whatsapp and Instagram are value-less if you use them by yourself. Viral by design.
Audience question: implications for Web 3.0 since it’s super community based?
He doesn’t know much about it. But the good thing is that you can see how users transact and use those linkages to design viral behaviours.
Audience question: how do you prioritise product, customer support, servicing, etc.?
“I’m old school, all of those are product”\
Audience question: how do dating companies do R+K>1?
Dating is not a great example because if you succeed your R+K drops
Apps like tinder are more profitable because they’re not out there to succeed in matchmaking, or at least not for longer than a few days
What are some odd examples of companies that looked like they couldn’t ever have a community. Do you know any companies that looked like they couldn’t have a community but managed to build a great community
semiconductor, supply chain optimisation
People who care deeply about esoteric topic. Enough of them can form a community
People collect all sorts of stuff
Community is about finding commonalities
Audience question: in B2B context, you have different types of users. The people who setup the system, the regular employees who use the system, the decision makers. How do you figure out community?
It depends because if the product is counting days off, then there’s probably not much room for community building
But if there’s some element of learning involved, then you can certainly build community around that
Audience question: are there any indications for when your current business is ready enough for virality?
Your retention is as high as you can make it. Before the retention is high, there is no point pushing the vitality.
You don wanna get vitality that doesn’t lead to retention
Is there a benchmark for R in SaaS?
Depends on the business. Some businesses have much higher R’s, some have 0.5 and that’s good enough
In SaaS, he recommends companies to charge for shorter periods of time to learn if their retention is good, unless they have an easy way to look at usage. For example if you charge for the year, and assume paying for 12 months means 12 month retention, you’re measuring the wrong thing
Audience question: what’s a good indicator that a company has found PMF?
Easier than you might realise
The market almost pulls your product
Once PMF happens, you realise you don’t struggle to sell the product
If you a small ARPU business (which means you need a large volume of sales going), you should see sales just happening
If you’re still struggling, it means you dont have PMF
Audience follow up question: could the struggle just mean you’re in a competitive market?
If every time you lose a sale is because of a competitor, then you’re in a market too busy for startups
Other than that, if you’re struggling to sell and when you ask why people give you different answer, you’re probably not looking at a ridiculous problem in the world, maybe just an interesting problem to solve
Audience follow-up question: is it just gut feel then?
Nope you can look at data
Here are 100 people who are qualified. what % said no and why. If all of them say “too expensive”, that means you have a pricing issue. But if they say they dont need it, then you objectively dont have pmf in that segment.
Every single yes or no, you must know why.
Audience question: what creative ways have you seen people foster a community model?
I’m not an expert on community building but I found user generated video answers to FAQs pretty interesting. Not just testimonials.
Anything a new customer asks should be answered by several past customers and publicly searchable/discoverable
Incentivise this. Customer needs a discount, give them a discount but ask them to answer a question via a video etc.
When you film a testimonial, dont just let the customer talk, you ask them questions. Usually you ask them a bunch of questions
Include a few in the FAQs
Audience question: how do you think about innovating in emerging markets that are using old tools?
Find out what they’re doing now, do exactly that but digitised to derisk PMF asap, then build the more ambitious, opinionated stuff that you wanna
Audience question: What do you mean by derisk PMF?
If you’re going on a mission in a jungle and there’s a turn that has a 80% chance of killing you, your job as a leader is to ask “how do I not take that turn, how do I not get killed?”
In startups, that’s PMF risk.
When a leader sees that risk of death, has choices, but ignores it and moves towards it, what do you think of that?
Then they are a non-philosopher. They’re not thinking philosophically enough.
I look for philosopher, warrior and nurturers as founders.
Reference: https://www.monkshill.com/content-hub/what-i-look-for-in-startups
Audience question: As a VC, to what extent do you try to validate a company’s R+K>1 before investing?
This is not religion at our VC firm.
We’re all former CEOs, we don’t treat each other as kids.
Any company that is going after a mass number of users, I’m looking at their retention and vitality.
If they’re not there, and worse, if the founders have no clue they should measure that, I’m not interested.
Surprisingly many founders don’t measure R and K. It’s like flying a plain and not knowing how the lift works.
References
The original R+K>1 article https://www.monkshill.com/content-hub/series-a-startups-take-note-r-k-1-is-your-formula-for-success
Feed Flow article by Peng https://www.entrepreneur.com/en-au/technology/the-future-of-app-engagement-is-in-the-feed-flow-ai/363173
My notes from another event where Peng talked about relationships vs transactions’ impact on LTV https://learningloop.org/blog/peng-ai-venture-capital
Get Together by Kai Elmer Soto https://gettogether.world/
Philosopher, warrior, nurturer https://www.monkshill.com/content-hub/what-i-look-for-in-startups
Slack’s founding (and pivot) story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6GYe_Wi4YU
Sina's recommendation (related to the points discusses)
The cold start problem (read the chapter on how slack got employees in target companies to bring other users onboard) https://a16z.com/books/the-cold-start-problem/
The embedded entrepreneur book (on building audience-driven businesses) https://www.embeddedentrepreneur.com/